U.N. Secretary-General Clinton?
"Once again the future of Bill Clinton has become a hot topic..."
"...There are reports that Bill Clinton already has lined up support for his candidacy from Germany, France, England, Ireland and New Zealand. A handful of African states, led by Nigeria, are rooting for Bill. And Hillary has brought in Morocco and Egypt. The Russians have let it be known that they would not object to Clinton as the next secretary-general..."
Bill recently told the Democratic Leadership Council, "We don't have to be more liberal, but we do have to be more relevant in a progressive way." To that statement, he added his new doctrine: "When we look weak in a time where people feel insecure, we lose. When people feel uncertain, they'd rather have somebody who's strong and wrong than somebody who's weak and right."
I see Clinton left off the third possibility (which describes HIS party), weak AND wrong.
Posted by: beaker at February 21, 2003 01:42 PMConsider this: Hillary becomes President #44 and Bill Secretary-General of the U.N.
I don't whether to laugh,cry or throw up.
The Hill and Bill Show
running the US and UN?
I'd get me a bunker in
Montana. I'm serious.
;)
Montana won't be far enough. Hells bells, Outer Mongolia won't be far enough.
Posted by: feste at February 24, 2003 06:23 PMDont make me sick.
Posted by: marcia crocker at March 30, 2003 08:35 AM